“We started where most companies start, with an Excel spreadsheet,” says Shawn Gallant, COO at Columbia Construction. “We found that as we grew, it just wasn’t a successful model because we didn’t have adaptability, changes were hard, and there was no forecasting ability.”
Table of Contents
Gallant’s comment captures a broader problem. Most contractors know how many people they have. Fewer know what those people can actually do. The spreadsheet tracks headcount, but it doesn’t track capability. You can count superintendents without knowing which ones have healthcare experience, data center expertise, or relationships with specific trade contractors.
93% of construction leaders report labor shortages affecting their operations. But the shortage isn’t just about headcount. It’s about having people with the right skills and experience for the work you want to pursue. You might have enough project managers on paper while lacking project managers who can deliver the type of work you’re trying to win.
What is skills gap analysis in construction?
Skills gap analysis systematically compares what your workforce can do against what your business needs them to do. The difference between current capabilities and future requirements reveals where you need to hire, train, or adjust strategy.
In construction, capability gaps show up as projects understaffed with qualified people, pursuits declined because you lack relevant experience, and teams stretched beyond their depth. A gap isn’t always a headcount problem. Sometimes you have enough people, just not enough people who can do a specific thing.
Beyond simple headcount planning
Traditional workforce planning counts bodies. Skills gap analysis evaluates capabilities. The distinction matters because construction work requires specific experience that generic headcount doesn’t capture.
“When you’re in many market sectors, you need the ability to be nimble with your staffing,” says Tyler Ganyo, Partner at DesCor Builders. “We’ve got certain guys that can do certain roles and need to know what that looks like.”
DesCor operates in 15 market sectors. A superintendent who excels in multifamily might struggle in industrial. A PM who has delivered $50 million healthcare projects might not be ready for a $150 million data center. Headcount planning misses these distinctions. Skills gap analysis surfaces them.
Why capability gaps determine what work you can pursue
The contractors winning work in specialized sectors have built capabilities their competitors lack. They can credibly propose experienced teams while others propose learning-as-we-go. Owners notice the difference.
73% of construction leaders consider a project team’s collective experience “very significant” in creating successful outcomes. If your capabilities don’t match the work you’re pursuing, you’re either losing bids to more credible competitors or winning projects you’ll struggle to deliver.
Identifying your current workforce capabilities
Skills gap analysis starts with understanding what you have. Most companies underestimate this step. They assume they know their workforce, but the knowledge is scattered across managers’ memories, outdated HR records, and hiring resumes that stopped being relevant years ago.
Building a capability inventory
Structure assessment around categories that matter for your business:
Build-type experience: Healthcare, industrial, data center, multifamily, ground-up, renovation? Track not just exposure but depth. Someone who spent a month on a healthcare project is different from someone who spent three years.
Market-sector experience: Government, private commercial, institutional, higher education? Each sector has different dynamics, procurement processes, and relationship patterns.
Technical skills: BIM coordination, specific software proficiencies, specialized construction methods. These often determine whether someone can contribute immediately or needs ramp-up time.
Certifications: Formal qualifications that gate what someone can legally perform or that clients require for specific project types.
Leadership and management: Team size managed, project complexity handled, client-facing responsibility. These determine readiness for larger or more complex assignments.
Assessment methods that produce reliable data
Project history is the most objective source. What projects has someone worked on, in what role, for how long? This evidence speaks louder than self-assessment. Internal Resumes track project history automatically as assignments complete, building capability records without manual data entry.
Manager assessment adds context but requires structured approaches. Supervisors evaluate based on observed performance, but their visibility is limited to projects they’ve overseen directly.
Self-reporting is useful for preferences but unreliable for capability claims. People overestimate their skills. Use self-reports for capturing where people want to develop, not for evaluating what they can do today.
Projecting future capability requirements
Gap analysis requires comparing current capabilities against future needs. The future requirements come from your strategic direction and project pipeline.
Strategic direction drives capability needs
Your business strategy shapes what capabilities you’ll need:
- Pursuing growth in data centers requires data center experience
- Expanding into new geographic markets requires local knowledge and relationships
- Taking on larger projects requires leadership capacity for complexity
- Emphasizing technology requires technical skills you may not have today
“We can be proactive and say, ‘In 12 months, we’ll have extra people that are very successful in remodels. Let’s go after some more remodels,’” says Daniel Barry, VP of Operations at Schimenti.
Barry is describing strategy informed by capability. Most contractors do the opposite: they pursue whatever opportunities emerge, then scramble to staff them. Gap analysis lets you align pursuit strategy with workforce reality or invest in building the capabilities your strategy requires.
Pipeline analysis makes requirements concrete
Your project pipeline provides specific signals:
- What types of projects are you pursuing?
- What experience will winning them require?
- What certifications are mandated?
- What client relationships would strengthen your proposals?
“Running scenarios where we can run specific projects like we’ve got 25 active projects and ten pursuits, 3 of which are 95%, so I can factor them into my forecasting,” says Shawn Gallant at Columbia Construction. “That’s priceless to be able to do that.”
Weight requirements by probability. A pursuit at 10% shouldn’t drive the same urgency as one at 90%. But if several early-stage pursuits all require the same capability you don’t have, that pattern deserves attention.
Time horizons for different responses
Near-term gaps (0-6 months) require immediate action. If you’re short a capability you need for an active project or high-probability pursuit, you’re looking at hiring, reassignment, or subcontracting.
Medium-term gaps (6-24 months) allow for development. You have time to train existing people, recruit strategically, or adjust your pursuit strategy.
Long-term gaps (2+ years) call for strategic planning. Build development programs, create career paths that develop the capabilities you’ll need, and factor workforce investment into business planning.
Conducting the gap analysis
With current capabilities inventoried and future requirements projected, the gap analysis becomes straightforward arithmetic in some areas and judgment calls in others.
Quantitative gaps you can count
Some gaps are numbers:
| Capability | Current | Required (12 months) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare PMs | 4 | 7 | -3 |
| Data center superintendents | 2 | 5 | -3 |
| LEED credentials | 8 | 15 | -7 |
These gaps tell you specifically how many people you need to hire or develop. They’re actionable.
Qualitative gaps that require judgment
Other gaps are harder to quantify:
- “Our data center experience is recent and shallow; competitors have deeper track records”
- “Our leadership pipeline lacks diversity of project types”
- “We have the skills but not the relationships in this market”
Qualitative gaps matter just as much but require interpretation. A competitor with ten years of data center experience has something you can’t replicate by hiring two people.
Prioritizing which gaps to address
Not every gap deserves the same attention. Evaluate based on:
Impact: How much does this gap affect your ability to pursue and deliver work? A gap in a strategic growth area matters more than a gap in a sector you’re exiting.
Urgency: How soon do you need this capability? A gap that affects active pursuits needs faster attention than one affecting projects two years out.
Feasibility: Can you realistically close this gap? Some capabilities take years to build. If you’re entering data centers next quarter, you can’t develop deep expertise from scratch.
Prioritize gaps that are high-impact, urgent, and feasible. Gaps that score low on all three may not need addressing at all.
Closing capability gaps through hiring and development
Once you’ve identified priority gaps, the question is how to close them.
When hiring is the right response
Hire when:
- The gap is urgent and can’t wait for development
- No internal candidates have the potential to develop the capability
- The capability requires experience you don’t have anywhere in the organization
- Fresh perspective would benefit the team
“Bridgit paints a picture of what we need to fill these slots with the right people,” says Daniel Barry at Schimenti. “Bridgit helps us grow responsibly and give HR the right facts so they know what we need and can recruit the right people.”
Barry’s point matters: hiring decisions should flow from identified gaps, not from generic growth assumptions. Job descriptions should reflect specific capability needs, and candidate evaluation should assess how well someone closes your actual gaps versus duplicating capabilities you already have.
When development is the right response
Develop when:
- You have internal candidates with potential
- The timeline allows for learning curves
- Building the capability internally creates career paths that improve retention
- The capability is strategic and long-term
41% of the construction workforce will reach retirement age by 2031. If you’re not developing people into senior roles, you’re setting up future capability gaps that will be harder to close through hiring alone.
“Having Bridgit has helped us develop a much clearer picture of our staffing needs,” says Lisa Villasmil, VP of People & Culture at Cauldwell Wingate. “This lets us see gaps and give people within the company opportunities to fill them, first and foremost.”
Development options include stretch assignments that build new capabilities, mentoring programs that pair junior people with experienced practitioners, training investments in specific skills, and career pathing that shows people how their development connects to advancement.
Make skills gaps analysis a continuous process
A one-time gap analysis produces a snapshot. Continuous capability tracking enables ongoing workforce strategy.
Building the data infrastructure
Capability tracking requires:
- Central repository: One system as the authoritative source
- Consistent structure: Standardized categories across the organization
- Integration: Connections to systems holding relevant data
- Maintenance processes: Clear ownership and procedures for keeping data current
Internal Resumes and forecasting tools connect capability data to workforce planning, making gap analysis an ongoing input to staffing decisions rather than a periodic exercise.
Regular refresh cycles
Run comprehensive gap analysis annually, aligned with strategic planning. But keep capability data current continuously:
- Project completions automatically update experience records
- Certification alerts trigger when credentials approach expiration
- Periodic audits verify data accuracy
Connecting gaps to business decisions
Gap analysis transforms workforce planning from headcount management to capability management. It connects business strategy to workforce development, identifies constraints before they become crises, and focuses hiring and development investments where they matter most.
In a market where 93% of leaders report labor shortages, the contractors who win aren’t necessarily the ones with the most people. They’re the ones who know exactly what capabilities they have, what capabilities they need, and how to close the gaps between the two.
